Compare tools
Pick 2–5 published tools. Values come from our evidence-checked profiles — an em-dash means unknown, never “no”. Ranking rows reflect the current published methodology for the comparison context.
CircleCI vs Harness
Context: CI/CD Tools · 20 rows
| Attribute | CircleCICircleCI | HarnessHarness |
|---|---|---|
| Identity · Taxonomy | ||
| Documentation | https://circleci.com/docs/ | https://developer.harness.io/ |
| Tags | ci, cd, devops, continuous-integration, usage-based | ci, cd, devops, enterprise, platform |
| Platform · Deployment | ||
| Delivery model | SaaS, self-hosted | SaaS, self-hosted |
| Pricing · Licensing | ||
| Free plan | true | true |
| Pricing model | free, usage | free, subscription, custom |
| Starting price | 15 | — |
| Features · Product · Fit | ||
| Core capabilities | Continuous integration and deployment pipelines, Self-hosted runners and CircleCI Server for on-premises installations, REST APIs (v1, v2, v3) and a Runner API, CircleCI CLI for local and scripted workflows, Audit logging with SSO, MFA, and OIDC token support | Continuous Delivery, Continuous Integration, and Code Repository modules, Feature Management, Chaos Engineering, and Security Testing Orchestration, Internal Developer Portal, Artifact Registry, and Cloud Cost Management, Database DevOps and Infrastructure as Code Management, REST API, CLI, and Terraform automation |
| Api · Integrations · Ecosystem | ||
| API available | true | true |
| CLI | true | true |
| Security · Privacy · Compliance | ||
| Regulatory compliance | FedRAMP Tailored, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, UK Extension to the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework | GDPR, CCPA |
| Security certifications | SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP Tailored | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019 |
| Support · Docs · Services | ||
| Support channels | — | Community support (Free plan), Standard support (Essentials plan), Premier support with dedicated account manager (Enterprise plan) |
| Audience · Use · Case | ||
| Best for | A usage-based CI/CD platform with a permanently free plan, credits-based paid tiers, and concurrency options for teams automating build, test, and deployment workflows. | A commercial delivery platform for organizations that want bundled CI/CD with infrastructure, security, and cost modules, available as SaaS or self-managed. |
| Company-size fit | SMB, mid-market, enterprise | individual, SMB, mid-market, enterprise |
| Primary use cases | Automating build, test, and deployment pipelines, Self-managed enterprise CI/CD with CircleCI Server | Enterprise application delivery pipelines, Feature flagging and experimentation, Cloud cost management and AI SRE operations |
| Lifecycle · Versioning | ||
| Changelog/release notes | https://circleci.com/changelog/ | — |
| Maintenance status | active | active |
| Vendor · Maintainer | ||
| Founded year | 2011 | — |
| Headquarters country | United States | — |
| Vendor type | commercial | commercial |
“—” means unknown (we never treat missing evidence as a negative). Cells reflect each value's current evidence state; superseded or stale values are excluded. Ranking rows are editorial assessments under the cited methodology version — see the CI/CD Tools category for definitions.