Compare tools
Pick 2–5 published tools. Values come from our evidence-checked profiles — an em-dash means unknown, never “no”. Ranking rows reflect the current published methodology for the comparison context.
CockroachDB vs MySQL
Context: Relational Database Management Systems · 24 rows
| Attribute | CockroachDBCockroach Labs | MySQLOracle |
|---|---|---|
| Identity · Taxonomy | ||
| Documentation | https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/ | https://dev.mysql.com/doc/ |
| Tags | distributed-sql, postgres-compatible, rdbms, cloud-native, high-availability | rdbms, sql, open-source, web-applications, oracle |
| Platform · Deployment | ||
| Delivery model | self-hosted, managed-cloud | self-hosted, managed-cloud |
| Pricing · Licensing | ||
| Free plan | true | true |
| Free trial | true | — |
| License model | source-available | dual-license |
| Pricing model | free, usage, subscription | free, custom |
| Source repository | https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach | https://github.com/mysql/mysql-server |
| SPDX license IDs | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Trial length | 30 | — |
| Features · Product · Fit | ||
| Core capabilities | distributed ACID transactions, automated failover with zero data loss, horizontal scaling without manual sharding, PostgreSQL compatibility, geo-partitioning and data locality controls | ACID transactional storage (InnoDB), replication and NDB clustering, HeatWave analytics and in-database machine learning, JSON document support, pluggable storage engines |
| Api · Integrations · Ecosystem | ||
| API available | true | true |
| CLI | true | true |
| Security · Privacy · Compliance | ||
| Regulatory compliance | PCI DSS, HIPAA | — |
| Audience · Use · Case | ||
| Best for | A source-available distributed SQL database for applications that require strong consistency and continued availability through node, zone, or region failures. | A widely deployed open source relational database with commercial editions, used heavily for web applications and available as the HeatWave cloud analytics service. |
| Company-size fit | SMB, mid-market, enterprise | SMB, mid-market, enterprise |
| Primary use cases | globally distributed OLTP, payments and fintech platforms, multi-region SaaS applications, high-availability systems of record | web and SaaS applications, online transaction processing, cloud analytics with HeatWave, embedded OEM databases |
| Skill level | advanced | intermediate |
| Lifecycle · Versioning | ||
| Changelog/release notes | https://www.cockroachlabs.com/docs/stable/releases/ | — |
| Current version | 26.3 | 9.7.3 |
| Maintenance status | active | active |
| Vendor · Maintainer | ||
| Founded year | 2015 | 1995 |
| Headquarters country | United States | United States |
| Vendor type | commercial | commercial |
“—” means unknown (we never treat missing evidence as a negative). Cells reflect each value's current evidence state; superseded or stale values are excluded. Ranking rows are editorial assessments under the cited methodology version — see the Relational Database Management Systems category for definitions.