Compare tools
Pick 2–5 published tools. Values come from our evidence-checked profiles — an em-dash means unknown, never “no”. Ranking rows reflect the current published methodology for the comparison context.
Microsoft Sentinel vs Exabeam
Context: Security Information & Event Management (SIEM) · 21 rows
| Attribute | Microsoft SentinelMicrosoft | ExabeamExabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Identity · Taxonomy | ||
| Documentation | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sentinel/ | https://docs.exabeam.com |
| Tags | siem, soar, ueba, cloud-native, microsoft-azure | siem, ueba, soar, threat-detection, insider-threat |
| Platform · Deployment | ||
| Delivery model | SaaS | SaaS, self-hosted |
| Pricing · Licensing | ||
| Free plan | true | — |
| Free trial | true | — |
| License model | proprietary | proprietary |
| Pricing model | usage | custom |
| Features · Product · Fit | ||
| Core capabilities | Cloud-native SIEM with built-in SOAR, User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA), Threat intelligence integration, Security data lake for low-cost retention, 400+ data connectors, Security Copilot AI assistance | Threat detection, investigation, and response (TDIR), User and entity behavior analytics, SOAR playbooks and automation, Insider threat detection, Log management, AI agents for SOC triage |
| Api · Integrations · Ecosystem | ||
| API available | true | true |
| CLI | true | — |
| Security · Privacy · Compliance | ||
| Regulatory compliance | GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS | GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOX, NIST CSF |
| Security certifications | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, FedRAMP, CSA STAR | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, IRAP Protected |
| Audience · Use · Case | ||
| Best for | Organizations standardized on Azure and Microsoft 365 that want a cloud-native pay-as-you-go SIEM with built-in SOAR and UEBA. | Security teams that want behavioral-analytics-driven detection and automated investigation, deployable in the cloud or self-hosted via the LogRhythm platform. |
| Company-size fit | SMB, mid-market, enterprise | mid-market, enterprise |
| Primary use cases | Threat detection, investigation, and response, Low-cost long-term log retention and compliance, SIEM migration from Splunk and QRadar, Proactive threat hunting | Insider threat programs, External threat detection, Compliance monitoring, SOC automation |
| Skill level | advanced | advanced |
| Lifecycle · Versioning | ||
| Changelog/release notes | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sentinel/whats-new | — |
| Maintenance status | active | active |
| Vendor · Maintainer | ||
| Founded year | 1975 | 2013 |
| Headquarters country | United States | United States |
| Vendor type | commercial | commercial |
“—” means unknown (we never treat missing evidence as a negative). Cells reflect each value's current evidence state; superseded or stale values are excluded. Ranking rows are editorial assessments under the cited methodology version — see the Security Information & Event Management (SIEM) category for definitions.