Compare tools
Pick 2–5 published tools. Values come from our evidence-checked profiles — an em-dash means unknown, never “no”. Ranking rows reflect the current published methodology for the comparison context.
Teamwork vs Basecamp
Context: Project Management Software · methodology v1.0.0 · 19 rows
| Attribute | TeamworkTeamwork.com | Basecamp37signals |
|---|---|---|
| Identity · Taxonomy | ||
| Documentation | https://devdocs.teamwork.com/ | https://github.com/basecamp/bc3-api |
| Tags | project-management, agencies, time-tracking, client-work | project-management, team-communication, remote-work |
| Platform · Deployment | ||
| Delivery model | SaaS, desktop, mobile | SaaS |
| Pricing · Licensing | ||
| Free plan | true | true |
| Free trial | true | true |
| Pricing model | free, subscription, seat, custom | free, subscription |
| Starting price | 10.99 | 25 |
| Trial length | 14 | 30 |
| Features · Product · Fit | ||
| Core capabilities | project and task management, Gantt charts, time tracking and billing, workload and resource management, automations | message boards, to-do lists, schedules, docs and file sharing, team chat, card tables |
| Api · Integrations · Ecosystem | ||
| API available | true | true |
| Security · Privacy · Compliance | ||
| Security certifications | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001 | — |
| Audience · Use · Case | ||
| Best for | Agencies and client-service teams that need project delivery combined with time tracking and billing. | Small teams and client-facing businesses that want straightforward project communication with flat, all-inclusive pricing. |
| Company-size fit | individual, SMB, mid-market, enterprise | individual, SMB, mid-market |
| Primary use cases | agency and client project management, time and billing management, resource planning | team project communication, client project management, remote team coordination |
| Skill level | beginner | beginner |
| Lifecycle · Versioning | ||
| Maintenance status | active | active |
| Vendor · Maintainer | ||
| Founded year | 2007 | 2004 |
| Headquarters country | Ireland | United States |
| Vendor type | commercial | commercial |
“—” means unknown (we never treat missing evidence as a negative). Cells reflect each value's current evidence state; superseded or stale values are excluded. Ranking rows are editorial assessments under the cited methodology version — see the Project Management Software category for definitions.